Study Author	BURNOUT	Effect of Mentorship on Burnout	Resident Satisfaction with Mentorship
	Mean MBI Pre-Intervention	Mean MBI Post-Intervention
Ares	(n=25) Emotional exhaustion: 7.6 (LOW) Depersonalization 6.5 (MODERATE) Personal accomplishment 15.9 (HIGH)	(n=25) Emotional exhaustion: 7.4 (LOW) Depersonalization 5.8 (MODERATE) Personal accomplishment 16 (HIGH)	Not significant.	Not assessed.
Salles	(n=40) Emotional exhaustion 3.52 (LOW) Depersonalization 2.92 (LOW) Personal accomplishment 5.68 (HIGH)	(n=50) Emotional exhaustion 3.50 (LOW) Depersonalization 2.89 (LOW) Personal achievement 5.71 (HIGH)	Not significant.	On average the program was rated as somewhat valuable. 8 out of 9 respondents provided positive comments on the value of the program.
Zhang	(n=8) Emotional exhaustion 47.6 (HIGH) Depersonalization 50.6 (HIGH) Personal accomplishment 16.5 (LOW)	(n=8) Emotional exhaustion 14.9 (LOW) Depersonalization 20.1 (LOW) Personal achievement 42.5 (HIGH)	Protective against burnout. (p<0.0001)	0.90 overall satisfaction on Likert-scale. Highest scores for “providing a role model”, “feel more supported”, and “having someone to turn to in times of difficult” at 0.92.
	Without Program Mentorship	With Program Mentorship
Elmore	75.7% met criteria for burnout on any subscale.	62.7% met criteria for burnout on any subscale.	Protective against burnout. (p<0.001)	Not assessed.
Janko	90.5% met criteria for higher three quarters of burnout.	69.6% met criteria for higher three quarters of burnout.	Protective against burnout. (p<0.01)	Not assessed.
Marchalik	74.6% met criteria for mod-high burnout.	60.2% met criteria for mod-high burnout.	Protective against burnout. (p=0.019)	Not assessed.
Oladeji	34.7% met criteria for high burnout.	30.7% met criteria for high burnout.	Not significant.	Quality of mentorship: 42.6% very satisfied/satisfied, 38.1% neutral. Satisfaction with mentor: 77.2% very satisfied/satisfied, 15.2% neutral. Importance of mentorship with respect to development as surgeon: 61.4% very important, 34.4% moderately important.

Mean MBI Pre-Intervention

Mean MBI Post-Intervention

Ares

(n=25)
Emotional exhaustion: 7.6 (LOW)
Depersonalization 6.5 (MODERATE)
Personal accomplishment 15.9 (HIGH)

(n=25)
Emotional exhaustion: 7.4 (LOW)
Depersonalization 5.8 (MODERATE)
Personal accomplishment 16 (HIGH)

Not significant.

Not assessed.

Salles

(n=40)
Emotional exhaustion 3.52 (LOW)
Depersonalization 2.92 (LOW)
Personal accomplishment 5.68 (HIGH)

(n=50)
Emotional exhaustion 3.50 (LOW)
Depersonalization 2.89 (LOW)
Personal achievement 5.71 (HIGH)

Not significant.

On average the program was rated as somewhat valuable.
8 out of 9 respondents provided positive comments on the value of the program.

Zhang

(n=8)
Emotional exhaustion 47.6 (HIGH)
Depersonalization 50.6 (HIGH)
Personal accomplishment 16.5 (LOW)

(n=8)
Emotional exhaustion 14.9 (LOW)
Depersonalization 20.1 (LOW)
Personal achievement 42.5 (HIGH)

Protective against burnout. (p<0.0001)

0.90 overall satisfaction on Likert-scale.
Highest scores for “providing a role model”, “feel more supported”, and “having someone to turn to in times of difficult” at 0.92.

Without Program Mentorship

With Program Mentorship

Elmore

75.7% met criteria for burnout on any subscale.

62.7% met criteria for burnout on any subscale.

Protective against burnout. (p<0.001)

Not assessed.

Janko

90.5% met criteria for higher three quarters of burnout.

69.6% met criteria for higher three quarters of burnout.

Protective against burnout. (p<0.01)

Not assessed.

Marchalik

74.6% met criteria for mod-high burnout.

60.2% met criteria for mod-high burnout.

Protective against burnout. (p=0.019)

Not assessed.

Oladeji

34.7% met criteria for high burnout.

30.7% met criteria for high burnout.

Not significant.

Quality of mentorship: 42.6% very satisfied/satisfied, 38.1% neutral.
Satisfaction with mentor: 77.2% very satisfied/satisfied, 15.2% neutral.
Importance of mentorship with respect to development as surgeon: 61.4% very important, 34.4% moderately important.